Can money cancel out rape and meat consumption?

Imagine there’s a non-profit that claims to offset the meat, dairy, and eggs consumption of one average omnivore for X dollars per month. In other words, the amount of suffering that they manage to prevent with those X dollars every month is exactly the same as the amount of suffering that you would prevent if you went vegan. Now imagine two average omnivores just watched some documentary about animal cruelty and decided to do something about it. One of them decided to go vegan, and the other decided to offset their consumption of animal products. Are their decisions morally equivalent…


An experiment in monetization

I’ve always liked the idea or making my articles available for everybody for free, and I will always do my best to make sure that nobody loses access to them for lack of money. I started blogging so many years ago because I thought there were too many harmful ideas floating around in the meme pool and I had to do something about it. When I write an article, no matter the subject, I do it because I genuinely feel that the subject is important and there is too much confusion about it, too many conflicting narratives that cannot reconciled…


How free speech and open dialogue can help minorities

Richard Dawkins sitting on a chair with a bookshelf in the background.
Richard Dawkins sitting on a chair with a bookshelf in the background.
Source: The Times

[Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Young Humanists International.]

Last Monday the American Humanist Association (AHA) retroactively withdrew Richard Dawkins’ 1996 award of “Humanist of the Year” due to “a history of making statements that use the guise of scientific discourse to demean marginalized groups”. The reward was withdrawn after a series of tweets about trans identity.

After the backlash, he published a tweet clarifying his point.

In 2015, he had also said he calls trans people by their…


How insights from different moral philosophies can help us find common ground

Should we tax the wealthy to help the poor? Should we try to eat less meat? Should abortion be legal? These are all questions that ultimately boil down to ethics. Moral philosophers have proposed different methods for answering them, but none seem to satisfy everyone. One of the most intuitive method is perhaps utilitarianism, a moral theory that tries to minimize harm and maximize well-being. In the absence of a universally accepted method, we seem to default to some version of utilitarianism, unless it conflicts with the religious and ideological convictions of a sufficiently large number of people, in which…


Why disagreements don’t prove morality is relative

Checker shadow illusion

This is the ninth of a series of articles defending a compatibilist interpretation of utilitarianism, which can be reconciled with all major moral theories. In the last article, I explain why the concepts of rights and moral desert are only valuable insofar as they contribute to a happier society. Follow me on social media and subscribe to my newsletter in order to be notified about the next articles in the series.

If morality is universal as I claim, then how come we differ so much on our gut level judgements? As I have argued before:

The best action is always…


Why we should avoid unverifiable moral claims

We should avoid magical thinking when discussing morality.

This is the eighth of a series of articles defending a compatibilist interpretation of utilitarianism, which can be reconciled with all major moral theories. In the last article, I explain why utilitarianism is not as demanding as it may seem. Follow me on social media and subscribe to my newsletter in order to be notified about the next articles in the series.

Logical positivism was a philosophical movement that attempted to approach philosophy as rationally as possible. Inspired by the success of the natural sciences, they concluded that philosophical claims that cannot be empirically verified are nothing but meaningless metaphysics…


Why utilitarianism is not as demanding as you may think

Silas self-flagellating in the movie The Da Vinci Code

This is the seventh of a series of articles defending a compatibilist interpretation of utilitarianism, which can be reconciled with all major moral theories. In the last article, I explain why utilitarianism doesn’t justify extreme injustice and inequality. Follow me on social media and subscribe to my newsletter in order to be notified about the next articles in the series.

Utilitarianism is the intuitive moral philosophy that promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number. A common objection brought up against it, however, is that it is too demanding. A theory that entails that I should let my child die…


Why exploiting minorities is not utilitarian

Anna Xuan’s illustration of the short story “Those Who Walk Away From Omelas”, by Ursula K. Le Guin

This is the sixth of a series of articles defending a compatibilist interpretation of utilitarianism, which can be reconciled with all major moral theories. In the last article, I explain why some types of suffering deserve more attention than others. Follow me on social media and subscribe to my newsletter in order to be notified about the next articles in the series.

Utilitarianism is the moral philosophy that promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number. One of the objections critics raise against it, however, is that it justifies unfairness. Fairness or justice can be interpreted in a couple of…


Why some types of suffering deserve more attention than others

This is the fifth of a series of articles defending a compatibilist interpretation of utilitarianism, which can be reconciled with all major moral theories. In the last article, I explain why rules are important for utilitarians. Follow me on social media and subscribe to my newsletter in order to be notified about the next articles in the series.

Utilitarianism is the moral philosophy that promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number. According to this view, if an action doesn’t cause any suffering, it should be morally permissible. But what if an action that relieves the suffering of person A…


Should we ever break rules for the greater good?

This is the fourth of a series of articles defending a compatibilist interpretation of utilitarianism, which can be reconciled with all major moral theories. In the last article, I explain why utilitarians are concerned with intentions, even though they’re consequentialists. Follow me on social media and subscribe to my newsletter in order to be notified about the next articles in the series.

Utilitarianism is the moral philosophy that promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Although this philosophy seems very intuitive at first, many object saying that sometimes it just feels wrong to do the thing that minimizes suffering…

Ariel Pontes

Secular-humanist, M.A. in analytic philosophy, volunteer at @YoungHumanIntl, blogger at ghostlessmachine.com. Support me at http://bit.ly/ArielPatreon.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store